Tuesday, 28 October 2014

Week Six: 28/10/2014

Arrangements, Authorship and Performance

Today was the day we had to present our abstract task from last week. The stimulus given to us was a meditation egg:


Stimulus given
 
The inspiration we got from the stimulus was that we didn’t actually know what it was and what to do with it, it felt heavy but in fact the sound was quite empty which gave us the idea of spreading the sound around the room, as the egg looks quite ornamental we though that using everyday objects to create the piece would be effective. When using the whole class to perform the piece we were conducted by Jennifer Cunningham. At random points she selected people to play their instruments meaning that we did not know what the overall outcome of the sound would be. It also meant that we were including the element of chance music, it was chance because no one knew what the overall outcome would be. The structure of the piece was improvised and it was in a fluid form. However there was a pre-meditated idea in our head with the given stimulus. The group responded well to our performance and each had our own input into the piece. The overall outcome of the piece sounded like rain and created a really good weather effect that was created from everyday objects showing once again that you can create music from anything. The piece turned out like this:



In today's session we focused on the arrangement of music as this is what will be done for our group assessment task. ''Arrangement' denotes a version of a piece of music with specific reference to the instruments involved, the manner in which they are played, and the order of the sections of the piece.' (Shepard, J. (2003)) Arrangements are different to the original and different to a cover of the song, they are modified in some way whether it be technically modified or vocally for instance making the instruments into voices an example of this is from our performance in first year where we arranged Gotye's 'Somebody That I Used To Know'. This is a clip from one of our rehearsals:


 

Another question there is to think about arrangements is whose piece is it once it has been arranged? Personally I thought that the original artist would be the owner of the piece as they created the idea based around the piece meaning that they came up with the whole creative perspective of the music. However, when creating an arrangement it is vital that you have your own creative input and ideas too therefore the 'arranger' should be credited for their work.

Individual learning:

As mentioned previously, I started to learn myself theory. But I have took it upon myself to learn not only the theory but practical side too. When at home I found that my brother, who is also a big fan of learning music is currently learning the ukulele as he is a bass player. I took it upon myself to ask how he plays and I have began learning how to play. This has inspired me to buy my own ukulele and learn to play more as I really enjoyed the excitement of learning something new and picking it up was fairly easy. Since then I have researched more on learning how to play and watched videos such as:


JustinGuitar (2013). Get started on Ukulele! Easy chords, strumming and songs! (Uke Beginner Lesson UK-001). [online]. Available from: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Qh2JQwkhjk>. [Accessed 28/10/2014].

Shepard, J. (2003). Continuum Encyclopedia of popular music of the world: volume 11 performance and production. London, Continuum.

Saturday, 25 October 2014

Week Five: 21/10/2014


Abstract

Before moving onto abstract music, we discussed the given task from Week 4 which was to create a piece of improvised music from a stimulus of abstract scores.


This score was really difficult to understand, it took us so long to create a piece in which we could have only recorded. The idea based around our piece was life, using everyday sounds such as cars passing, crowds and natural noises. As we looked into this further we agreed that it reminded all of us of a heart monitor, in which gave us the idea of a composed piece which would inspire ours:

Undying23 (2009). Frédéric Chopin's "Raindrop" Prelude, Op 28, No. 15. [online]. Available from: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OFHXmiZP38>. [Accessed 25/10/2014].

The piece does not quite home the same ideas as ours yet we found it interesting and used this to arch our piece. The heartbeat monitor would be the base of the piece as the heart is a connection each person has, we then from the structure of the score built up to the idea of the growth of a person. Child, teenage, adult, elder and then of course death. This could have been done using different sounds such as a baby crying and then silence for death. From our ideas I don't think that it was what the composer intended for the score, however how abstract was the original piece? I wouldn't class our piece as music but I would compare it to the score and ask others of what their interpretation of this would be. I found this task difficult but it did give us the opportunity to add whatever creative ideas we felt and bring them to life through the score. Music doesn't have to be sonic, it could be a performance, a visual.

Exploring chance music and abstract music linking to improvisation which was previously studied in the last session.
What is abstract?

When we discuss abstract we assume that it is in relation to subject such as art or 'outside of the box' thinking. In music it simply means that it should not be representational, it should not have a concept nor words/vocals and titles of music should be constructivist. Abstract music has three types under its category: the use of random procedures to produce a determinate fixed score, mobile form and indeterminate notation including graphic notation or texts.
'Its composers generally intend for the structure of each piece to stand on its own without extra associations.' (http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-absolute-music.htm#comments)
The harmonies and melodies of a piece of absolute music are not tied to emotional reactions or interpretations. It gives the composer the opportunity to illustrate a talent to the audience and the audience the opportunity to evoke their own thoughts and feelings to what they are listening too.
'
The ideas behind the origins of absolute music are closely related to those of abstract art. Both are not intended to represent anything concrete.' (http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-absolute-music.htm#comments) Aleatoric music is simply abstract music meaning to chance. We looked at a few examples of these types of music created by composers who wanted to explore their musical talent. The three we looked at were Boris Blacher, Steinvord and Stripsody. All three of these examples are very different, but they all want to evoke the same idea and concept, they all want the audience to have very different opinions to create music that does not necessarily agree with everyone.


TheWelleszCompany (2011). Boris Blacher: Abstrakte Oper n.1 op.43 (1953) (1/2). [online]. Available from: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsNGLWyOPmA>. [Accessed 25/10/2014].

godtiermusic (2012). steinvord - Maelstrom [HQ 1080p]. [online]. Available from: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCHielWnOWA>. [Accessed25/10/2014].  
barbussemusique (2011). Stipsody. [online]. Available from: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHUQFGhXHCw>. [Accessed 25/10/2014]. 

wiseGeek [online]. (2014). Available from: <http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-absolute-music.htm#comments>. [Accessed 25/10/2014].

Week Four: 14/10/14

Improvisation


In the session today, we explored 'improvisation'. The thought of improvisation instantly makes me connect it to drama and how we explore characters and situations through an 'on the spot' performance. However using it through music is also important and can help the musician to become more creative and imaginative with their music. The three main points to think about when preparing for improvisation is to firstly;
have a collective goal, central/general ideas,
have a pre-discussed set of rules,

allow space for the improvisation to happen.
Improvisation is important as it gives the musician the chance to personalise their music. It gives them the opportunity to display thoughts and feelings of the time.

We then used these in action and began an activity which would help us to feel comfortable with the use of improvisation and understand it better. The activity involved us laid in a relaxed position with our backs on the floor, touching shoulders with the people next to you sot that you are connected. As you exhale, create a sound in any pitch. Sounds commonly used where; Ah, Mo, Me, La, Sh, Zz and Mm.


The activity gave us a clearer understanding of improvisation and how the group could connect and communicate without making a physical connection. Even when not planning the performance the group aligned and became in tune with each other. This was through communication with one another and how the brain is connected through music. It was clear to see who had the most musicality in the group and who struggled as those who tended to come in with each other through timing and pitch found it easy to to improvise once a main sound had been found. As the activity carried on it then shown how much people were trying to use their natural skill of harmonising trying to create music over the top of others. A huge part of improvisation.

Improvisation was originally made through jazz musicians who wanted to experiment with their music, to create something new. 'The revolution of improvising in the western world came through jazz. Jazz wasn’t only revolt, but also an expression for a desire to live and create beauty at the same moment.' (http://bergmark.org/why.html)

What I found the most interesting about the history of improvisation was the fact that it was swayed mainly from black musicians, they wanted to embrace the culture and freedom of their race which was mainly the issue in the 1960's when this was usually found. 'To the same degree that self-respect increased, the respect for the classical music culture was given up. The choice of instruments often became exotic and experimental, a.o. things many used toy instruments.' (http://bergmark.org/why.html)

Improvisation is closely linked to the traditional use of 'scatting', when looking at examples of improvisation I found it interesting as to how easy these musicians found it, firstly looking at the famous Ella Fitzgerald (1969):

add youtube video here

In this piece I found that she already had a prepared structure as she sung the blues because of this it gave her the initial overall idea of what she was going to do, she often used the instruments as a base and mimicked their sounds keeping this in mind she would then mess around with the vocals and vary her pitch and tempo then return to the original structure.

This is not unfamiliar with improvisation as musicians like to know a structure to base their piece on, which gives them more ideas as the improvisation progresses. Artists tend to draw on their past experiences whether it be vocally or through movement to create improvisation, they mix all of their knowledge together to create something that has been heard but not heard before. Long held notes, repeated sounds, constant communication and signals to one another are commonly found within an artists creative piece. Which makes us question whether it is actually improvisation or not? Improvisation is a dialogue.

When putting improvisation into practice we used a stimuli of a storm. This gave us a rough idea of how we were going to create this. Our ideas generated from the weather that is created in a storm, this gave us the perfect opportunity to use instruments such as shakers, chimes/bells and drums to create the chaos of a storm.


I felt as though it was easy to create this piece, especially with the given stimuli as it gave you a starting point. However if this included vocals I feel as though this would have been a lot more of a struggle.

After experimenting with our own piece, we then discussed the use of chance music. Personally I thought this would have been around the same thing as improvisation, chancing what you do with music. However, chance music has an element of pre-planning whereas improvisation has an idea. Chance could be simply done by rolling a dice to determine what comes next within a piece. John Cage – a performer who is famous for his chance music experimented with this procedure, he done this by using an ancient Chinese book called 'I-ching'. His most famous performance is the 4'33" piece:


this performance is based on silence and only sounds from the audience. For example. Sniffing, coughing, and rustling. The audience almost where the performers without knowing. The book used dictated this abstract piece, the strange 'music' was disorganised and messy like. I found it overwhelming how someone could use nothing and be famous for something he regards as 'music'. Chance music is not so dissimilar to improvisation although the piece's contrast in so many ways.

What is improvisation and why improvise? [online]. (2014). Available from: <http://bergmark.org/why.html>. [Accessed 21/10/2014].

diegodobini2 (2012). Ella Fitzgerald : One note Samba (scat singing) 1969. [online]. Available from:< https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbL9vr4Q2LU>. [Accessed 25/12/2014].
 

Saturday, 11 October 2014

Week Three: 7/10/2014

Creative Task


S
o after the given task of creating our own piece of music, it was now time to present these. It was important that before we listened to each composition that we thought thoroughly about what the made the compositions a good piece of music and what we should improve on musically. We made a list of some points we thought should be considered when assessing a piece of music.

 
Assessment Criteria


Musicality was the first point and this was one of the main points that came from the discussion. Musicality should be the organisation of the sound. Questioning if the piece is actually music or if it just noise or sound. A piece must have this to even qualify as music, and this first point links to other aspects of assessment criteria, such as emotive lyrics, concept, originality and effort. When giving other groups feedback it gave us an essential outline of what we were listening for, did their piece have use of dynamics? Was it structured? And did it use devices such as harmonies? Could the audience emotionally connect and understand their reasoning for lyrics or was it just music to them? Each one of the point was used for most groups which will only help them to improve their composing skills.

We also looked for these in our own piece:


 
We received both positive and negative feedback for our performance as it was so different and creative. Each piece of feedback was helpful to our group as we understood some points such as balance in the volume. However some points, personally I disagreed with although they should be taken into consideration too like creating more lyrics. We used little lyric to infuse the culture and depth of African society and struggles. Which is why we didn't want to take that away with lyrics. We wanted the audience to hear each household 'instrument' used and for them to understand reasoning behind the idea, which I thought was portrayed well throughout the song.

Overall I agreed with most comments and was pleased to hear and be given useful feedback from peers and Hayley.

After attending the last few sessions, I have really enjoyed the in depth discussions about music and what music is. It has gave me inspiration to start to think about what I want to gain from my lessons and how I could achieve this myself. As I am only a singer and have only ever known this I thought about challenging myself and so I bought a book:

Usborne (1996). Music Theory for Beginners. 1st. ed. London: Usborne Publishing Ltd.

I have always wanted to grasp the knowledge of the theoretical side to music, but I have never been confident enough to teach myself. I decided to do this as I sometimes feel like I know nothing, I feel as though I cannot do anything when given a task or just asked a question because I am just a singer. So I am hoping that this book alongside digging out that old keyboard that I will be able to gain confidence and talent by the end of this year.

Tuesday, 7 October 2014

Week One: 23/09/2014 - reading reference

Week Two: 30/09/2014

What is Music?
Continuing from the explored session on music last week and thinking about personal views on music it has helped us to influence decisions made in this weeks lesson. Given the task to create our own music, we have decided to follow on from last weeks music task and create it from everyday objects and technology. The influence we have taken is African and 'The Lion King' musical soundtrack.
The reason for this is the speech we were given by Martin Luther King, we wanted to embrace the African culture and the way they created music from nothing and still brought something beautiful to it. Using only sounds and dynamics in their voices and instruments it was clear that the African Chant is an ancient, soulful and natural tradition. The speech was very influential as it spoke about racism and the fight against it.

'And He's allowed me to go up to the mountain. And I've looked over. And I've seen the Promised Land. I may not get there with you. But I want you to know tonight, that we, as a people, will get to the promised land!'
The section of the quote given to us filled us with the ideas of culture, nature and beauty. Personally I related this back to last week when speaking about how natural music is and how easy it is to find, create or listen to. There is no avoiding it, and with using this quote and the speech it has proven to me that even when African culture was in its most deprived state they still found the energy, equipment and positivity to make something beautiful which gave them life and hope.
Using a laptop as the only technical part to our composition we have enforced tables, created shakers and loaned sounds that will give our music the soul that has infused this cultures music for generations.
American Rhetoric [online]. (2014). Available from: <http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/mlkivebeentothemountaintop.htm>. [Accessed 04/10/2014].

Nikki Francis (2011). The Lion King on Broadway - Grasslands Chant. [online]. Available from: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0xW6xtEmdw>. [Accessed 07/10/2014].




Week One: 23/09/2014

What is Music?
Focusing on the exploration of music and what it is, is a very personal matter to each person. Music is a subject which we usually find ourselves talking about on a daily basis whether it be; listening or watching the news, charts or media. Chatting to friends or looking through social networks. However, every discussion about music can never be agreed nor disagreed as everyone has a different view on what music is? 'Anything made before 1940 or after 1960 isn't really music at all.' (Daniel J. Levitin:13. (2007).) To me, music is a meaningful and emotive expression of feelings and thoughts, it is also timeless. It can persuade and influence the mind, act as a release or emotionally enhance others feelings. Everyone is musical whether they are conscious of this or not, an example of this would be that at least once each person has said 'I have a song stuck in my head'. Music is a natural part of life and is merely 'organised sound' famously defined by Edguard Varese (http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/artists/9a6d6ce0-3496-4db2-8c7a-f2a9a14548a9). This means that it can only be controlled for a short amount of time, as it is constantly developing through technology and the development of people themselves. People can not be told that they can't listen to music that attracts them, as in history when the catholic church banned new and upcoming influences in music such as polyphony. This goes to show that people have different feelings towards music and change within the industry. 'Composers in the tradition are like the painters who stepped outside of the boundaries of representational and realistic art.' (Daniel J. Levitin:14. (2007).) Music is all around us.


BBC [online]. (2014). Available from: <http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/artists/9a6d6ce0-3496-4db2-8c7a-f2a9a14548a9>. [Accessed 23/09/2014].
Daniel J. Levitin (2007). This Is Your Brain on Music. 1st. ed. London: Penguin.